There is a salty expression that seems apt at the moment: “Don’t p*ss on me and tell me it’s raining.” A number of charities that have failed to support the current Harper administration might well echo the sentiment expressed in that injunction.
The Canada Revenue Agency is currently auditing a number of Canadian charities, sniffing around for suspect “political activity.” The list of targets reads like a Who’s Who of Canadian charitable institutions: Amnesty International is on the list, and so is Kairos, stupidly denounced as “anti-Semitic” a few years back by the egregiously dishonest Minister Jason Kenney; the David Suzuki Foundation, Tides Canada, Equiterre, Environmental Defence, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, PEN Canada, Canada Without Poverty, even the United Church of Canada.
But CRA claims, apparently with a straight face, that its persecution of charities whose missions and goals are not aligned with those of the Harper government has nothing to do with their progressive orientation. Mon oeil.
It’s going after environmental groups, human rights, and international aid groups, and organizations receiving donations from labour unions. And it’s spinning the process out, in order to bleed as many resources as it can from the charities under the gun, which have been forced to divert their scarce funds and staff to answering the incessant demands of auditors camped on their doorsteps, sometimes for years. Only one revocation of charitable status has been made so far—a doctors’ charity in 2012. CRA has now made its witchhunt (for that is what it is) a permanent feature of its organization.
And it’s succeeding. As researcher Gareth Kirkby notes: “The government is attempting with some success to narrow society’s important policy conversations.”
A chill has indeed fallen upon the charitable community. As Kirkby has found, charities are now afraid to speak out on public policy issues, fearing it could result in long and expensive audits that they can ill afford. They’re spending more of their donations on paperwork. Kirkby puts it squarely: “The data suggest that the current federal government is corrupting Canada’s democratic processes by treating as political enemies these civil society organizations whose contributions to public policy conversations differ from government priorities.”
That’s quite an indictment, and it should make all of us look over our shoulders, not just the folks on Harper’s ever-expanding enemies list. As Kirkby concludes, “It says something about the health of our democracy when these moderate organizations who many people donate to and support, peaceful organizations, are demonized…as being criminal or terrorist organizations…and then find themselves under threat of audits.”
Some charities are considering court action to force the CRA to cease and desist from its selective and costly snooping. A blue-chip Bay Street law firm has offered its services pro bono to PEN Canada. For its part, the NDP has demanded a third-party inquiry into alleged CRA malfeasance—which, in the unlikely event it were agreed to by the government, could not be completed before the next election.
Harper has already gone after the scientists, and the artists, and First Nations, and trade unionists, and Elections Canada, and Statistics Canada, and the employees of the National Library, and our diplomats, and even weather forecasters.
Now it’s the turn of registered charities. Tomorrow, who knows? But we can be sure that this government, perhaps better termed a “regime” at this point, will soon look about for new prey. “I did no more than you let me do,” said the Hangman in Maurice Ogden’s poetic fable. It’s up to every one of us to stop him—and our window of opportunity appears to be closing fast.